heala
Heala vs Strong
Strong has been the default lifting log for years, and deservedly — it is fast, clean and does not get in the way. The question is what a log alone leaves undone.
- Very fast set entry
- Templates and history
- Plate calculator
- Clean, focused, reliable
- Set entry, or say it out loud
- A programme written from your history
- Food, sleep and recovery beside it
- Cardio and body composition
What Strong does well
Speed and reliability in the gym, which is most of what a lifting log needs to be. Templates, history and a plate calculator, without clutter.
It has a long track record and a loyal user base for good reasons, and if a log is genuinely all you want, it is hard to beat.
What Heala adds
It writes next week from what you logged — progression, deloads and session shuffling, rather than a history you interpret yourself.
It reads the sets against your food, sleep and recovery, so a stalled lift has a visible cause instead of being a mystery.
And it covers cardio, body composition and the nutrition side in the same subscription.
Logging speed, honestly
A dedicated log will always feel marginally quicker at set entry, because that is the only thing it does. Heala closes most of that gap by letting you say the session out loud — "squats 5×5 at 100 kg" writes the sets without opening a screen.
Questions
Can I import my Strong history?
There is no direct import. You can rebuild your templates or have the AI write an equivalent programme.
Is Heala as fast to log a set?
Close, and it has a route Strong does not: saying the set out loud.
The quiz is free, takes about four minutes and needs no card. It ends with your calorie target, your macros and a training week you can look at.
Build my plan